<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>News on Jake Quist</title><link>https://www.jakequist.com/news/</link><description>Recent content in News on Jake Quist</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.jakequist.com/news/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>IDEs Are for Micromanagers</title><link>https://www.jakequist.com/news/ides-are-for-micromanagers/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.jakequist.com/news/ides-are-for-micromanagers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Six months ago, if you&amp;rsquo;d asked me whether a terminal-based coding tool could compete with a full IDE, I would have chortled into my coffee. Six months ago, Cursor (and friends) had it all: slick interfaces, deep integrations, and massive funding. Claude Code was just a TUI. It felt like Anthropic wasn&amp;rsquo;t being serious about the space and threw a half-baked product into the wild.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="image.png" alt="Google Trends Chart Showing That Claude Code Is Overtaking Cursor"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Now Is a Great Time to Be a People-Oriented Engineer</title><link>https://www.jakequist.com/news/now-is-a-great-time-to-be-a-people-oriented-engineer/</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.jakequist.com/news/now-is-a-great-time-to-be-a-people-oriented-engineer/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Right now I&amp;rsquo;m running four instances of Claude Code on different projects, one instance of Codex, and one of Gemini. Two of the projects are serious. The rest are toy apps I may never ship. I glance at each one every few minutes, approve a change, redirect an approach, catch a hallucination. It feels like spinning plates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It also feels familiar. This is what happened when processors went from single-core to multi-core. The individual cores were actually slower than the single-core chips they replaced. Measured in isolation, it was a downgrade. But it didn&amp;rsquo;t matter, because you could run things in parallel, and the aggregate throughput was so much higher that it felt like magic.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What Happens To Developer Tools After Claude Code?</title><link>https://www.jakequist.com/news/what-happens-to-developer-tools-after-claude-code/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.jakequist.com/news/what-happens-to-developer-tools-after-claude-code/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;rsquo;re building a developer tool right now, you probably have a launch plan: Post it on Show HN. Grind for GitHub stars. Maybe host a hackathon or two. You know, the standard playbook.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I suspect this playbook will soon become obsolete. Not because it doesn&amp;rsquo;t work on humans, but because humans are no longer the ones choosing the tools.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s not that humans have left the loop. A human still decides which tools end up in a project. But increasingly, that decision gets mediated by an AI coding agent.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What Happens When AI Can Write All Your Software?</title><link>https://www.jakequist.com/news/what-happens-when-ai-can-write-all-your-software/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.jakequist.com/news/what-happens-when-ai-can-write-all-your-software/</guid><description>&lt;figure&gt;
 &lt;img
 src="https://www.jakequist.com/news/what-happens-when-ai-can-write-all-your-software/llm_gets_contract_hu_32e1859930cf3682.webp"
 width="500"
 height="333"
 alt="LLMs winning a contract over human developer"
 loading="lazy"
 decoding="async"
 /&gt;
 &lt;/figure&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A few weeks ago, while refactoring some of my old code, I asked an LLM to write a &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_buffer"&gt;RingBuffer&lt;/a&gt; implementation in TypeScript. I&amp;rsquo;ve written these before in other languages. I know the tricky edge cases, especially around concurrency. To my surprise — and mild horror — the LLM wrote it flawlessly. Better than I could have. No feedback necessary. No vibing at all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then I asked it to build something slightly more ambitious: a personal CRM.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Big Tech vs. OpenClaw</title><link>https://www.jakequist.com/news/big-tech-vs-openclaw/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.jakequist.com/news/big-tech-vs-openclaw/</guid><description>&lt;figure&gt;
 &lt;img
 src="https://www.jakequist.com/news/big-tech-vs-openclaw/lobster_vs_gorilla_hu_573b844338d3255b.webp"
 width="500"
 height="333"
 alt="Lobster vs Gorilla"
 loading="lazy"
 decoding="async"
 /&gt;
 &lt;/figure&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenClaw launched last week. If you haven&amp;rsquo;t tried it yet, it&amp;rsquo;s essentially a way for AI to control your computer on your behalf. You describe what you want done, and it does it—clicking, typing, navigating, the whole thing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s impressive technology. But the most interesting thing about OpenClaw isn&amp;rsquo;t what it can do. It&amp;rsquo;s what it means for the companies that have spent the last fifteen years figuring out how to capture and hold our attention.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>OpenClaw is What Apple Intelligence Should Have Been</title><link>https://www.jakequist.com/news/openclaw-is-what-apple-intelligence-should-have-been/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.jakequist.com/news/openclaw-is-what-apple-intelligence-should-have-been/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Something strange is happening with Mac Minis. They&amp;rsquo;re selling out everywhere, and it&amp;rsquo;s not because people suddenly need more coffee table computers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you browse Reddit or HN, you&amp;rsquo;ll see the same pattern: people are buying Mac Minis specifically to run AI agents with computer use. They&amp;rsquo;re setting up headless machines whose sole job is to automate their workflows. OpenClaw—the open-source framework that lets you run Claude, GPT-5, or whatever model you want to actually control your computer—has become the killer app for Mac hardware. Not Final Cut. Not Logic. An AI agent that clicks buttons.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>